Cameron, now what is his problem

Cameron is a bit like the racing driver who likes everything one sided, the best team, the most money, the most up to date, engine, tyres and equipment and a bit of sabotage of the opposition whenever possible. To put it frankly, the cards have got to be stacked in his favour before he even gets to sit at the table. He can not take surprises or be questioned on things which requires he think about them. He likes to be heard and not questioned, if he is then he'll only repeat himself or go on the defensive. He is a poor man's intellectual, not to mean he is poor but he would never inspire anyone in their right mind.  This would account for his constant, constipated angry look. In fact he should be called the constipated Prime Minister with his side kick smarmy school boy Georgie. These things always appear clear when he is at the dispatch box.

Time and time again Cameron will espouse the great deed of putting people into work, yet repeatedly he is unable to ask the question why it is the cost of living has dropped and why is it a large proportion of these jobs are low paid and part time hours. This leads him on the defensive to chastise the previous government and request an apology for their record.  Yet the national deficit is 1.2 trillion pounds and continues to increase. On the issue of asylum for Syrian refugees, Cameron diverts from the question and refuses answer why the UK will  not be taking in refugees.  Then yet again in facing a question from Miliband of why there is 13 million people in the UK in poverty and being in work Cameron again has no answer.  Yet again he goes on the defensive attacking Labour and their prediction there would be a higher unemployment rate. The reality of people being on welfare benefits and also being sanctioned more frequently on those benefits is not considered by either party.  It is clear though, if more people in poverty than there has been and there are more people in work and more people claiming some form of national assistance. The numbers don't add up. Labour has a question which has to be answered.

Yet as we know, he'd rather continue to hold the angry constipated PM look. As PM he leads an example of what good behaviour should be, and his aggression and avoidance of questions makes PMQs look as Berkow says like a Punch and Judy show.

Osborne's stupidity moves to higher levels of stupidity

It seems George Osborne never fails to go from one level of stupidity to another level of stupidity. He must live above a well of ignorance and stupidity and each time he goes home he is recharged again with these wonderful traits run through his personality like the place name on a stick of rock. (sugary cylindrical sweet,generally bought from sea side towns with the town's name printed through it). He stands on in his pulpit and tells Europe it needs to become more competitive and generate more wealth, stating it has been in steady decline for years, suggesting it was in decline even before the Tories came to power.  So although he and Cameron stood at the dispatch box and chastised Labour's government, they actually know and understand the recession of Europe is European and not British alone.  They've known this all along but like the idea of giving a kicking to the opposition. This is where Ed Miliband is unable to defend his party as he is unable to roll his sleeves up and play dirty, unlike Ed Balls who seems to have a real knack of being able to get under the skin of many Torys.

The Tories have excelled at job creation and on every chance will publicly state this, but equally the public response is to ask, how many of these jobs are on zero hour contracts, how many of these jobs are low paid, how many people are taking up multiple jobs as a means to support themselves.  In addition they target the benefits system and want to reduce the benefits bill. Yet, many of those same persons who are taking up these jobs which have been made have to request additional subsistence from the state to top up their income.  The retorting argument asks the Tories to examine the cost of living crisis the country is going through but they don't want to know about it.  It is a case like everything else, the Devil is in the details and Osborne knows it.  On a recent episode of Question Time even the Tory chairman Grant Chapps was seen to be unable to adequately answer these accusations.  He just doesn't have a clue, just like Osborne, born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

Osborne has only one cure for a recession, it is to cut back, and cut back even further.  His Tory illiterates are unable to consider it will only take an exceedingly long term view of the economy and the world which will bring the UK out of recession and make it competitive.  We're talking ten or twenty years.  He wants to cut back on welfare but in doing so he doesn't consider what is the best way to get people totally dependent on the welfare state off the welfare state. He doesn't consider these people may have become part institutionalised into being incapable or helpless.  He has got an notion how to encourage and help them gain pride in theirselves, he'd rather just cut back further and make an even lower social class of poverty the country has ever seen.  He can not see it is the who package which needs to be acted on. Education, help, support, responsibility and even employers who can see they to have to take a role in training people. A new born baby may not be able to speak so you wouldn't want it on a call centre, but at the same time you know in twenty years it will be a capable human being. Employers need help to recruit from the long term jobless and take on staff who may not be of much use this very moment, but after sufficient training and support they will be valuable employees. Nope, George sees only one way ahead, cut, cut, cut, let the rich stay rich and the poor get even poorer.

In ten or twenty years from  now George Osborne will be in the news again. I can see in him an individual who likes to be in the limelight, he loves the attention. There is a touch of the histrionic about his personality, as well as a touch of the stupid, a bloody big touch of the stupid.  I can see George being in the news for something bad he has done, or for losing his entire livelihood.  For this is the future for someone as stupid as he is.  Unless he can employ helpers on zero hour contracts who are a bit more knowledgeable.  Of course he will, he's setting up the economy right now for this kind of scenario.  But mark my words George is heading for a fall at some time, I'm sure it will be when he is out of government. The crystal ball has told me so.

George Osborne the most irritating chancellor ever

It doesn't matter what picture I see of Mr Osborne, he has a sly smug on his face which raises my blood pressure.  He's a rich boy who doesn't know what the repercussions are for the decisions he makes.  The arrogance he has oozes through his skin.  But the out of place smile makes me want to get physical, I don't know why but I do.  When I speak to other people there is a similar reaction.  How can someone propagate so much dislike to so many people and never have been actually known to them?  It is every physical movement and action he has, it is like he has wickedly run off with all the Christmas presents and knows you don't yet know it.  It is also in his voice.  He is there because he likes the attention and the fame.  Not because he is actually any good at economics, it's a false belief for anyone to think he does.  Together Cameron and Osborne make a right pair, walking down the road hand in hand in their own little world but actually ruling the world.  For them the whole situation is glorifying.  Except of course we can see Cameron cracking at the seems, whilst Osborne would carry on doing what he does and hold complete and utter denial of everything.  He is therefore the worst and most irritating Chancellor this country can have at this time.  We are on the rocks and he doesn't know how to get us off the rocks and with his self arrogance he will never learn.  It is inevitable, the entire country is going down the pan.

It must be common knowledge to anyone who doesn't have to really think to hard, that the Lib Dems present taste of power will not happen again for another seventy years.  By choosing to sleep with the devil they have lost their identity.  Danny Alexander who may at one time have been inspiring has been overcome by power and position.  He is corrupted by it all.  Nick the Clegg can expect to never be an MP again after he shafted the very voters who put him in the game when he was elected.  Students, he was the one who promised in the Lib Dem manifesto student fees would be abolished.  In the coalition they rose.  The promises made now appear like lies.  He would only have stood a real chance if he had not gone to bed with Cameron, doesn't he know Cameron already sleeps with Osborne?  Of course not.  Clegg wears a yellow tie but to me it is looking a hell of a lot like blue nowadays.  Clegg like Osborne is lost in a different way.  Osborne is in self arrogance, Clegg is in blindness and inability to understand.  His new bed fellows don't really care about keeping him warm at night, how can they when they are having such a good time giving him the shaft.  If you see out this parliament Clegg I doubt if you will ever have another career in politics.  Don't worry, just put on  one of Osbourne's rye self deluding arrogant smiles, you'll feel better perhaps but it you'll still look like an utter idiot.

Thatcher was not a saint so don't treat her like one

Meryl Streep has starred in a new film about Margaret Thatcher, it has received critical acclaim and recommendation.  However, it does not portray the real effects Thatcher had on the whole of British society, for the working classes and the poor she only reduced their options.  I would even say it is ironic an American took on the main role of Thatcher but it was probably only an American who didn't know, hadn't lived through it and could be hoodwinked would accept such a role.  I love to watch movies, but the scar tissue left after growing up through the Thatcher years runs deep.  The film is supposed to show a woman who is the vanguard of women's rights.  I can not believe any self preserving woman would look at Maggy as a role model.  For she has none of those female charms a self respecting man could ever fall for, there was no compassion for family life, no acknowledgement for the opportunities of children, education or the NHS.  Thatcher was in it because she could act and be a Sergeant major and everyone else had to take note.  Shame on this country for ever putting her there, and shame on us for not having a viable alternative.

Anyone would know she won the first election because she was the better alternative to a verbose Kinnock, he may have been OK as a Labour activist but at the ballot box it is public impact and impression which mattered.  Unfortunately Labour stand by their leaders even if they don't cut the cloth with public opinion.  Thatcher public backing because of her authoritarian air she carried the appearance of the wannabee middle classes in stereotype.  She duped them by her background of being a grocer's girl.  For me though she was and is in every way the personification of evil in politics.  She did one good thing, got Britain the biggest rebate ever from the Common Market.  Otherwise she stole from the poor, she stole ice creams from babies on hot summer days.  Meryl dear you have done yourself no great good by representing such a despicable person you have only shown ignorance and your fan base has certainly diminished by one.  I'm sure though there will be others who feel the same way on this matter.

It was because of Thatcher's deregulation of the financial sector today's recession has hit Britain even harder than it should of.  Regulations are there for a reason.  There was the boom of the 80s because of this deregulation and everybody began to purchase shares in amenities which were once state owned.  Amenities now such as the railways that have become a downtrodden mess, constantly looking for cash because their operators are constantly looking for profit.  The tax payer helps rail companies keep profits but had they never been privatised in the first place then the cost wouldn't be so great today.  Our very infrastructure is now built on decay and is ready to crumble.  Subsidies which would of paid for the basic improvement of infrastructure now go to pay the profit of fat cats.  Such is the legacy of Thatcher.

There was no doubt in the minds of the majority of people Thatcher would of lost the third election except for one branch of hope, which portrayed her as the most likely person to see the UK through.  On account of her Iron Lady temperament.  In short it was the Falklands.  If we were going to war it had to be someone who showed we were tough and could not be pushed about.  This is the absolute and sole reason she managed to win this last term.  With her cabinet constantly being reshuffled, if they did not agree or shape up to her way then there was only one other way, the highway.  Out.  She could not take dissension amongst her midst everyone had to suck up to her.  This ultimately lead to her own downfall and the downfall of the then Tory party.  Thank God for that.  Her hubris was limitless. She once even referred to herself using the royal "we,"  what she did was to impose an even greater class society.  The rich stayed rich or got even richer from taking over state owned and runed facilities, the poor became destitute.  This is not the actions of a saint and the sooner she is expunged from memory the better.

Cameron's grip, but not on reality

Cameron is a person who knows nothing about poverty, he has lived a privileged life never wanted or known what it is like to feel hungry.  His idea of prosperity for the UK is the 2012 Olympics and the Queen's Diamond Jubilee.  The giant white elephant of an Olympics which to date has cost this country 9.3 billion pounds.  Something which he has had no part in bringing to fruition which was achieved by the government before.  Further for him stating there is a Jubilee or Olympics is one of those other pitiful excuses to say he has no idea of what to do.  He has shirked his responsibility.  Cameron is a man who doesn't conceive to create jobs means there has to be a growth strategy which in turn would mean spending money in order to make money, to secure the future of this country.  He has even admitted unemployment will go up.  Cameron was the man who said he will cut back on public sector jobs and the private sector will create more jobs.  This was without any notion of what is happening in the private sector or of how the private sector would create these jobs.  The fact is the private sector doesn't have the vacancies available and isn't being encouraged by Cameron or his henchman Osbourne to make jobs; flies over his head.  The effect as public sector jobs are lost the welfare state bill increases, less taxes are paid and the country descends gradually down into a gloomy pit which Cameron is industriously digging.  Cameron is a miner.  A miner of depression.  When ever listening to this man you can only get the impression here is someone who is in charge, he and Osbourne are drenched in their own hubris, they can't see it, and will carry on talking about things they know nothing about.  They stand up and wave the Union Jack, then close the door wrap themselves in those flags and this becomes their Teflon shield.  They fail to listen and attack, attacking everything related to the working people of the UK that is needed.  Welfare rights, education and the National Health Service.  Nothing is off limits.  Their mouths open and all they speak are lies, the more emphatic it is said the greater the lie.  God help the UK.

Michael Gove, a dispicable irritant

The face of the present government is a nasty one.  It acts like a bully, anyone who does not agree with it's austerity measures and fiscal policy is chastised.  There is no room to listen because it thinks it knows best.  An icon of this warped attitude is Michael Gove.  He has been on news programs voicing his opinion all day to the strike action taken.  When I see him I see a man who can not string an argument together, a man who should not be in a ministerial post by any means.  He has like all those other minsters a self righteous attitude and I can't help but feel the urge to throttle him.  Mild mannered moi.

Maybe it is something to do with his body language and the way he looks.  There is this false sense of sincerity all Tory MPs give off.  They are in the middle of a storm and haven't got the faintest notion of their own hubris about to hit them full in the face.  Unfortunately, they can easily turn the other cheek being they are financially better off than most of the population.  Millionaires the lot of them.  Gove, Osbourne and Cameron, they all ooze this slimy better than thou attitude.  They love the blame game, they love to shower their hard words of depravity upon the rest of us.  They have no sense beyond their own world how other people survive and empathy is not a word they perceive.  Just take any video of Gove and see for yourself, hold back from shouting out "idiot" followed by some other obscenity because this will only increase your blood pressure.

Gove, Gove, Gove, when will you be gone?